Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
-
Property
Rights in Genetically Modified Plants
- State
GMO Restrictions and the Dormant Commerce Clause
- Almost
half of all state legislatures passed bills relating to ag biotech in 2001
(including Missouri)
- Criminalizing Crop Destruction and
Intentional Animal Release (Missouri statutes, 2001)
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 537.353: Liability for damage or destruction of
field crop products
*double damages *reasonable attorney fees
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 578.023: Keeper of dangerous wild animals must
register animals
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 578.029: Knowingly releasing an animal, crime
of--penalty
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 578.414: The Crop Protection Act
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 578.416: Crop Protection Act--Prohibited Acts
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 578.418: Crop Protection Act--Violations,
Penalties, Civil Actions
- Missouri
Statutes, Chapter 578.420: Crop Protection Act--Investigation of
Alleged Violations
-
Farmers'
Liability for GMO Crops (pdf)
- Biosafety
Protocol for Genetically Modified Organisms: Overview (CRS Report,
July 5, 2000)
- Genetically
Engineered Foods
- CropChoice.com:
Alternatives for American farmers
- Monsanto
goes after Indiana farmer for Roundup contract violations
- Corporate
seed police
- Food
Safety Issues (Consumers Union, producers of the magazine Consumer
Reports)
- A Report Card for the EPA, Successes and Failures in Implementing the Food Quality Protection Act
- SCIENCE, PRECAUTION AND FOOD SAFETY: HOW CAN WE DO BETTER?
- GENETIC ENGINEERING IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF CONVENTIONAL PLANT
BREEDING: How genetic engineering differs from conventional breeding, hybridization, wide crosses and horizontal gene transfer
- TOWARDS A MORE PRECAUTIONARY AND MORE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO RISK ASSESSMENT: A CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE ON FOOD SAFETY
- Position
Paper on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture (Midwest
Sustainable Ag Working Group)
- Obtaining
Approval to Market GMOs in the European Union
- Acceptability
in Commercial Channels of GMO Hybrids (Harl)
- Further
Discussion on Acceptability in Commercial Channels of GMO Hybrids (Harl)
- Genetically
Modified Crops: Guidelines for Producers (Harl)
- GMO
Labelling: Effects on Core Business Objectives in the Grains Value
Chain (Ginder)
- Economic
Perspectives on GMO Market Segregation
- GMOs
in Europe: A Genetically Modified Ordeal?
- Acceptability
in Commercial Channels of GMO Hybrids
- Further
Discussion on the Acceptability in Commercial Channels of GMO Hybrids
- Genetically
Modified Organisms
- Health
Implications of GM Foods
- AgBioS
(Agriculture & Biotechnology Strategies--Canada)
- Biotechnology
for the Developing World ("pro" speech)
- Council
for Biotechnology Information (pro-GM industry)
- Genetically
Modified Food: UK and World News
- Who's
Spinning the GM Story?
- Monsanto: Visionary or Architect of
Bioserfdom? A Global Socio-Economic Examination of Genetically Modified Organisms
- Biotechnology: Commercialization and Economic Aspects
- Australian scientist calls for socio-economic considerations in
GE debate
- Biotech and Developing Countries
- 31 Critical Questions in Agricultural Biotechnology
- BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING: THE MORAL AND ETHICAL DIMENSIONS: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Journal of
Biolaw & Business
- Basic
Principles in Bioethics & Biolaw
- Class
Action Lawsuits
- CAST
Position Statement on Food and Agricultural Biotechnology
- Spotlight
on Genetically Engineered Foods (law firm newsletter)
- Position
Paper on Genetic Engineering (Midwest Sustainable Agriculture Working
Group)
- Health
Implications of Genetically Modified Foods (Professor Liam Donaldson and
Sir Robert May)
- Professor
William H. Lesser (economist, Cornell), researches "implications of
patents for plants, seeds, and animals
- U.S.
vs. EU: An Examination of the Trade Issues Surrounding Genetically
Modified Food (pdf; 14 pages)
=========================================================================
Focusing more on the StarLink controversies:
- StarLink
Corn Controvery (CRS Report, January 10, 2001)
- Europeans
Adopt Tough New Rules For GMO Foods (2/15/2001)
- Aventis
Fires Top Managers in Wake of StarLink Scandal (2/12/01)
- 44
Americans Claim StarLink Corn Made Them Ill
- Latest
News About the StarLink GE Corn Scandal
- EPA
Advisory Panel Reports on StarLink Corn (December 5, 2000)
- CAST:
Voluntary Recall of Taco Bell Taco Shells Containing StarLink Corn
- Aventis
Inks StarLink Settlement: Farmers, Elevators to get Millions
- StarLink
said to be contained
- Missouri
starts testing service for StarLink
- Japan
finds more Bt corn in shipments
- StarLink
said to be contained
- Biotech
jeopardizes world's food supply
- Missouri
Attorney General wants Aventis to post bond
- Scientists
urge more Bt scrutiny
- Biotech
corn problems hurting exports
- Lack
of regulation making it hard to keep StarLink out of nation's food supply
- EPA
promises rigorous review of biotech corn
- StarLink
corn: How it reached the food supply
- Growers
grapple with challenges of handling GMOs
- Biotech
labeling suit dismissed: FDA policy on gene-altering stands
- Unapproved
corn found in tacos (September 18, 2000)
- Aventis
CropScience extends deadline for farmers to file for marketing costs
- StarLink
Corn Information from the Illinois Department of Agriculture
- Acceptability
in Commercial Channels of GMO Hybrids
- Further
Discussion on Acceptability in Commercial Channels of GMO Hybrids
- EPA's
Biopesticides News and Topics Website
- StarLink:
More Bad News for Biotech
- Possible
Human Health Hazards of Genetically Engineered Bt Crops
- Aventis
on Allergens and the Protein Allergen in StarLink Corn
- Aventis'
website of press releases about the StarLink controversy
- BSE
and GMOs: Facts and Fantasies
- Is
There A Future For Genetically Engineered Food?
- Consumer
Groups Shouldn't Reject Biotech (Center for Science in the Public Interest)
- StarLink
Corn and Food Allergies: Statement to EPA by Michael Hansen
- Comments
on the Human Health and Product Characterization Sections of EPA's Bt
Plant-Pesticides Biopesticides Registration Action Document
- FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES: DIFFERENT CULTURES, DIFFERENT LAWS,
by Marsha A. Echols. Summer, 1998, 4 Colum. J. Eur. L. 525, 13,302 words.
- BIOTECH POLLUTION: ASSESSING LIABILITY FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROP PRODUCTION AND GENETIC DRIFT,
by Richard A. Repp. 2000, 36 Idaho L. Rev. 585, 20,077 words or 37
pages. (good
discussion of liability theories)
- DIVERGING VIEWS OF DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TOWARD THE PATENTABILITY OF BIOTECHNOLOGY,
by Kevin W. McCabe. Fall, 1998, 6 J. Intell. Prop. L. 41, 13,319 words.
- CHILLING OF THE CORN: AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE FACE OF U.S. PATENT LAW AND THE CARTAGENA
PROTOCOL, by Cliff D. Weston. Summer, 2000, 4 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 377,
18,965 words.
- "GMO:" Genetically Modified Organism or Gigantic Monetary Obligation?
The Liability Schemes for GMO Damage in the United States and the European
Union,
by A. Bryan Endres. August, 2000, 22 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 453,
27,716 words or 60 pages.
(good discussion of liability
theories)
- "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes?" Corporate Liability for the International
Propagation of Genetically Altered Agricultural Products, by Stephen Kelly Lewis.
Spring, 1997, 10 Transnat'l Law. 153, 28,003 words or 52 pages. (good
discussion of liability theories)
- Biotechnology Through the Eyes of an Opponent: The Resistance of Activist Jeremy
Rifkin, by Paul S. Naik. Spring, 2000, 5 Va.
J.L. & Tech. 5, 26133 words.
- Class Actions and Social Issue Torts in the Gulf South, by Francis E. McGovern.
June, 2000, 74 Tul. L. Rev. 1655, 11108 words.
NOTE: To access the law journal articles
mentioned above in items 26-33, you can use ACADEMIC
UNIVERSE (Lexis-Nexis) over the internet IF you have access through the
University's subscription (Do you connect to the internet by dialing up the
University's modem pool?). Click on "Legal Research," and then
"Law Reviews." Type in the "Keyword" box either the
title or the author's name, making sure you select under "Date"
through the pull-down menu the relevant time period, such as "previous five
years" instead of the "previous six months."
Or you can go to the School of Law library
and find most of the articles (for in-library use only; photocopying available
if you purchase a card).